I began reading “Human-friendly Cities and Pop-up Urban
Projects” in the Urban Planning group of Linked-In to understand what the author, Krzysztof Bilinski, meant
by “pop-up”. I found myself underlining the text and making notes in the
margin. The following presents each underlined passage and associated margin
note. Words in parentheses are my attempts to clarify the brevity.
Bilinski (B):
“What…makes those places special and what do they have in common?”
Hosack (H):
Research is required to answer the question, but research topics and a common,
comparative measurement language have been missing.
B: “…the 20th
century modernism paradigm (planning), which aimed at dividing a city by its
functions, failed.
H: I wouldn’t
claim that planning failed to achieve an objective, but it needs to redefine
its goal, strategy, tactics, measurement, and correlation ability before it can
begin to build knowledge capable of consistently improving the results produced
by practitioners around the globe.
B: “According to
Jan Gehl…using a human scale can resolve problems our cities struggle with…”
H: The term “human
scale” sounds great, but there has been no quantitative measurement system
capable of defining the term with relevant measurements of shelter capacity,
intensity, intrusion, and dominance at the project, neighborhood, district,
city, and regional levels of The Built Domain.
B: “We have a wide range
of tools at our disposal whose purpose is to make redevelopment of the cities
easier.”
H: We don’t. I
have previously written two editions of “Land Development Calculations:
Interactive Tools and Techniques for Site Planning, Analysis, and Design” and
have recently published “The Science of City Design: Architectural Algorithms
for City Planning and Design Leadership” to contribute some of the
comprehensive, quantitative tools, language, and knowledge needed.
B: There has to be
a bridge between city planners, real estate companies, and city residents”.
H: The bridge must
extend further. Chapter 14 of “The Science of City Design” discusses the topic.
Correlation among isolated public and private specialties is a key concept, but
it requires a focus on relevant, measureable, and correlated Big Data.
B: Ghent, Belgium
example of pop-up project: “After (a) few summer weeks urban furniture and
plants are removed and streets go back to the way they were….”
H: It is creative,
but appears to be a desperate solution to resolve inadequate open space. Its
primary contribution is the growing awareness of the need for open space and
change.
B: Wroclaw, Poland
has introduced a cargo container bandstand for 3 months on a recently
renovated public square to increase its popularity. Blue seats have been placed at the stairs of one of the boulevards to increase their usefulness. "Before, this place was uninviting..."
H: Not all open
space is equal in popularity, but its presence is an asset that is invaluable.
B: “Pop-up
initiatives…stand for simple, creative, and significantly improving urban space
solutions.”
H: Some of the
examples I’ve read here, and in other articles, represent creative but partial
attempts to modify impossible open space deficiencies. They illustrate the need
for a permanent revision to the goals, strategy, and tactics adopted to define
our cities and their four divisions: Shelter, Movement, Open Space, and Life
Support. Hope is preserved when a network of open space is woven through the urban pattern to coexist with its source of life - The Natural Domain and its cosmic parent.
No comments:
Post a Comment