Original zoning laws attempted to separate incompatible land
use activity and ensure that adequate light, air, and ventilation reached the
internal and external places we inhabit. It was a declaration of human rights
at a time when excessive intensity was a function of unbridled speculative
interest, limited mobility, and lack of concern for the public health, safety,
and welfare. Individual freedom to dominate was challenged by the collective freedom
to demand a better quality of life.
Land use is a deceptively simple term. It means the activity
that takes place on any given land area. Incompatible land use activity is
separated by zoning district plans. Annexation law permits activity districts to
expand over natural and agricultural land. The fact that most activity requires
shelter, movement, open space, and life support is taken for granted. The
result has been a sprawling Built Domain that consumes land as needed. The
problem has become increasingly apparent, but awareness does not solve problems.
It simply raises questions among populations taught to believe that this is a world
without end, to be fruitful, and to multiply.
Sprawl was first seen with aerial photography. Time has
shown that sprawl is growing. This awareness has alerted human instinct to anticipate
implications; but anticipation requires a language that can measure, evaluate,
and treat the problem. Sprawl is land use activity sheltered by building
capacity and intensity. It is extended and served by movement, open space, and
life support systems. Shelter capacity is simply gross building area per
buildable acre. Shelter capacity options are a function of the values assigned
to a building category template. Intensity is a function of the shelter
capacity chosen from the options available. Intensity measurement and
prediction is the key to sheltering growing populations within a geographically
limited Built Domain that protects their quality of life from excessive intensity
and their source of life from excessive encroachment.
Keep in mind that a building can shelter any activity,
assuming zoning and building code compliance. Activity can be moved to another
building to achieve land use compatibility, but the physical context of shelter
remains to affect our social, psychological, environmental, and economic
quality of life. Credible context measurement, evaluation, prediction, and
correlation with related databases are needed to connect shelter capacity,
intensity, and activity with its many quality of life implications.
No comments:
Post a Comment