Search This Blog

Tuesday, April 4, 2023

The Decisions Needed to Shelter the Activities of Growing Populations Within a Limited Built Domain

 

If you agree that we need shelter to survive on an unstable planet, and that the Natural Domain is a source of life that must be protected, then the remaining question concerns the land area that must be devoted to the Natural Domain; and the Built Domain area that remains to accommodate shelter for the activities of a growing populations seeking a desirable quality of life. I will leave this question to others far more qualified to answer.

My objective is to explain the tools needed to measure and predict shelter capacity and intensity options for any limited land area, given the assumption that the Built Domain cannot continue to expand and consume its agricultural land and the land of the Natural Domain indefinitely. This is the knowledge we will need to more accurately consider the shelter potential of any land area in any designated Built Domain.

Shelter begins as building mass we call gross building area. Gross building area produces shelter capacity, intensity, intrusion, and dominance that can be measured and predicted. Gross building area may be occupied by any activity and molded to achieve any appearance. The more fundamental point is that gross building area per buildable acre, or shelter capacity, combines with occupant activity to determine the scope of revenue potential per buildable acre; but excessive intensity can undermine the quality of life desired. Different activities produce different revenue quantities per square foot. This means that revenue per buildable acre is a function of the gross building area, shelter capacity, intensity, and activity introduced. The combinations combine to form neighborhoods, districts, cities, regions, and so on; but cities have not had the information management systems, predictive algorithms, and development control needed to reconcile the productive capacity of municipal land per acre with the annual expense per acre required to deliver all desired services. At this point, the debate over “essential” services begins in every city hall facing budget cuts.

The gross building area introduced per acre of buildable land area occupied is referred to as shelter capacity. The shelter capacity of a cell, or land area, is a function of the building design category chosen and the design specification values entered in its forecast model. Shelter capacity decisions have intensity, intrusion, and dominance implications that can be calculated, evaluated, and predicted at the cellular level of shelter formation.

It helps to recognize that gross building area is a universal measurement; that gross building area divided by the buildable acres occupied is a measure of shelter capacity; that shelter capacity can be occupied by any activity; that shelter capacity can be used to measure or calculate the physical intensity, intrusion, and dominance present or planned; that physical intensity produces a host of social, psychological, environmental, and economic implications; and that the intensity planned for activity within the Built Domain contributes to the physical, social, and economic relationships established.

Built Domain Classification

Built Domain classification begins with its urban and rural phyla. It continues with the shelter, movement, open space, and life support divisions within each phylum. The shelter division contains the building design categories listed in Table 1. This relatively limited list can be occupied by any activity group we currently refer to as a land use category. The separation of building design category and capacity from land use activity serves to explain a relationship that can be correlated to produce a desired economic yield per acre when shelter capacity forecasting is available.

The specification topics related to each building design category represent the initial language of shelter capacity design. I will introduce Table 2 as an example in a moment. The values assigned to the shaded values in a forecast model represent the parameters being considered to lead all ensuing design decisions. These values define the gross building area options under consideration. The intensity, intrusion, and dominance implications of these decisions are also calculated in each forecast model to permit the evaluation required to build knowledge and establish leadership direction.

Building Design Categories in the Shelter Division

Building design category classification begins with the parking system under consideration. The parking decision, including a “no parking” option, defines the building design category under consideration, since the parking system is directly related to the gross building area that can be created on a given land area. There are a number of variables involved in addition to parking as you will soon see, but the principal determinants of shelter capacity prediction are the core buildable area available, the building design category, parking requirement , floor quantity, and unpaved project open space percentage being considered.

Design Specification Values

When building classification is based on the parking system involved, the number of potential building design categories is limited. This makes measurement and mathematical prediction of gross building area and shelter capacity options for all categories feasible in a short period of time – when using design specification values in the spreadsheet format of a forecast model. It is, after all, shelter capacity, intensity, and activity that must be economically correlated on every acre within municipal boundaries to protect its quality and source of life. The social, psychological, environmental, and economic implications of these predictions will remain unknown until evaluated by many related but currently independent professions. This means that independent professional observations can be correlated with the design specification values involved. Sprawl has failed to achieve this correlated goal, even though it may produce immediate economic benefit that proves temporary over time.

Forecast Model Example

I’ve introduced Table 2 is an example of a forecast model I’ve introduced many times. It pertains to the G1.L1 predictive model. This is shorthand for a forecast model that applies to all buildings served by a surface parking lot around, but not under, the building (G1) when gross land area is given (L1).

Table 2 is an example of the design specification vocabulary used to measure and/or predict the shelter capacity of a given land area. The shaded areas indicate decision locations for optional value entries that are correlated by the model’s algorithm to produce the gross building area, shelter capacity, intensity, and activity implied. A change to one or more of these value decisions produces a revised template calculation. These shaded value decisions control the formation of cellular capacity for shelter activity, intensity, and revenue within cities.

Core Land Area

I’ve referred to the buildable land area remaining for building cover (footprint) and parking cover on a given gross land area as the core area. It is found through a process of subtraction that begins with the value entered in cell F3. The shaded values entered from cell F4 to F29 are subtracted to find the core area remaining (CORE) in cell F33 and G33. This is a key variable in the master equation noted in cell B39.

The master equation also depends on the parking variables (s & a) entered in shaded cells A35 and A36 and the floor quantity variable (f) entered in shaded cells A44-A53.

Planning Forecast Panel

The Land Module and Core Module variables entered in the shaded cells noted are used to calculate the gross building area options in cells B44-B53 of the Planning Forecast Panel. Additional design information in the panel can be calculated using the gross building area values predicted.

Implications Module

The shelter capacity, intensity, intrusion, and dominance implications of the design specification values entered in the shaded cells of Table 2 are calculated in its Implications Module based on the gross building area options predicted in its Planning Forecast Panel. The implication equations involved are noted on line 43 of the Implications Module.

Conclusion

Table 2 has been included to generally illustrate the predictive format used for all forecast models listed in Table 1. They have all been created to both measure existing design specification values for evaluation of existing conditions and to predict the correlated implications of contemplated design specification values. The concept is similar to our first blood pressure measurements. In the beginning, these measurements were just an idea. The identification, collection, evaluation, correlation, and sharing of measurement and observation began to improve the diagnostic ability of medicine. The measurement and prediction of shelter capacity makes this possible for all the disciplines associated with the evaluation and planning of a Built Domain that must become capable of coexisting with its source of life while ensuring its quality of life within geographic limits.









No comments:

Post a Comment