The shelter capacity of property depends on the core land area remaining for building footprint and parking lot area after all other site improvement topic areas are subtracted.
Shelter capacity is gross
building area in square feet divided by the buildable acres occupied.
This principle is illustrated by Diagram 1, based on the G1
Building Design Category.
The G1 category is one of six in
a building classification system based on the primary parking system used to
serve building activity. The G1 category addresses all buildings served by a
parking lot around, but not under, the building on the same premise.
Diagram 1 illustrates the principle noted. It shows a series of site plan topic rings surrounding a black rectangle designating the core area available for building cover (BCA) and parking lot area (PLA).
Site plan topics identified by the shaded cells of Table 1 c
an
be measured in square feet or estimated as percentages of the land area involved.
The topics in cells F4-F6 and F8 are subtracted from the gross land area given
in cell F3 to find the buildable land area (BLA) remaining in cell F10. The entire
process of measurement, or percentage estimation, and subtraction leads to the
core area remaining in cell F33 and is explained in the italicized text below. The
master equation that defines the shelter capacity of G1 core area under
specified conditions depends on the identification of this quantity.
G1 CORE AREA DERIVATION
Gross land area is equal to the
total land area defined to accommodate building construction or expansion,
excluding future reserve areas.
Buildable land area (BLA) is equal
to gross land area (GLA) minus the sum of unbuildable area (UNB), existing
condition area (ECA), future expansion area (FXA), easement area (EAS), and
public right-of-way area (ROW).
Unpaved open space (OSAU) is
equal to a given percentage of buildable land area (BLA).
Impervious cover capacity (IMP)
is equal to buildable land area (BLA) minus the unpaved open space present or
planned (OSAU).
Impervious cover remaining
(IMPR) is equal to total impervious cover (IMP) minus shared, or common,
impervious cover present or planned (COSP).
Unpaved open space remaining
(UOSR) is equal to total unpaved open space (OSAU) minus the common, or shared,
unpaved open space present or planned (COSU).
Remaining shelter land area (SHA)
is equal to the sum of the impervious cover remaining (IMPR) and unpaved open
space remaining (UOSR).
Impervious cover (PSSP) present
or planned in the shelter area (SHA) is equal to the sum of paved open space area
(SOSP), miscellaneous pavement area (MPA), driveway area (DRA), exterior entry
pavement area (EEP), and loading area (LDA) present or planned.
Unpaved open space remaining in
the shelter area (UOSR) is equal to total unpaved open space (OSAU) minus the
common or shared unpaved open space present or planned (COSU).
Core area impervious cover (CORE)
is equal to shelter area (SHA) minus the sum of miscellaneous impervious cover
area (PSSP) and remaining unpaved open space area (UOSR) in the shelter area.
G1 SHELTER CAPACITY
The shelter capacity of core land area, or the square feet
of gross building area capacity (GBA) per acre of buildable land area (BLA), is
defined for the G1 Building Design Category by the master equation derived in
Table 2.7 of the book entitled, “The Equations of Urban Design”, by Walter M.
Hosack. The equation states that:
GBA =
((af / (a+(fs))) * CORE Equation
G1.L1
When:
s = estimated pkg. &
circulation area per garage space in square feet
a = building square feet
permitted per parking space
f = floor quantity
The equation shows that the gross building area (GBA)
capacity of core land area (CORE) is a function of the (a), (f), and (s) values
chosen for the coefficient in the equation. These are design decisions that are
often limited by zoning ordinance regulations, but the ordinances have not understood,
or been able to predict, their combined implications.
The (s) and (a) variables needed by the equation have been
entered into shaded cells A35 and A36 of Table 1. The floor quantity variables needed
(f) have been entered into shaded cells A44-A53. The equation in cell B39 produces
the gross building area options (GBA) presented in cells B44-B53. These are
converted into shelter capacity, intensity, intrusion, and context implication
measurements in cells F44-J53 of the Implications Module. The equations used to
produce the related measurements in Columns C-J of the Planning Forecast Panel
and Implications Module are referenced on line 43 of the table. This system of
measurement makes it possible to consistently compare and evaluate implications
that may represent “excessive intensity” and “sprawl” at the ends of a shelter
capacity spectrum that can now be calibrated.
When the gray cell topics in Table 1 are consistently measured
at existing locations, the comparable planning and implication data calibrated can
be evaluated to build the shelter capacity knowledge and vocabulary needed to
begin forming a leadership language. It is needed to lead the many involved
toward shelter in limited geographic areas defined to protect their source of
life -- the Natural Domain.
Shelter capacity measurement, prediction, and implication
evaluation has been derived as a quantitative foundation for the evaluation of
shelter capacity options within a limited Built Domain that will remain after
definition of an essential Natural Domain. These options have implications that
include, but are not limited to, the physical, social, psychological,
environmental, and economic results of option choices on the quality of life produced.
I have had the temerity to call the shelter capacity measurement
and evaluation effort Tegimenics, and the body of leadership knowledge that can
be consistently assembled in perpetuity, Tegimenology.
Walter M.
Hosack, February 2026
PS: This
discussion was limited to the G1 Building Design Category. The full discussion
involving all six building design categories can be found in my book, “The
Equations of Urban Design”. It is available from Amazon.com.
PSS: During
this essay I discovered an error in my book concerning Diagram 1 and its
correlation with Table 1. Diagram 1 has been corrected in this essay.



No comments:
Post a Comment