Photo: courtesy of NASA |
Urban form
has become visible with the introduction of satellite photography. As we peer
through this microscope in space, think of the picture included with this note as
a petri dish. The growth medium is brown, blue, and green. The white mass in
the dish is a Built Domain that is growing through a process we call annexation
and sprawl. (Ignore the clouds) This Built Domain is growing one property cell
at a time to threaten its source of life – The Natural Domain. (I’ve just referred
to it as a growth medium.) The threat is prompted by a mandate to be “fruitful”
and our admiration of “growth”; but we are on a planet that is no longer a
world with end, and we are no longer threatened by a lack of population.
At the
present time, urban growth is a metastasizing disease on the face of the planet.
We are parasites that must adopt a symbiotic role to survive. The Built Domain
is a threat to our source of life. Its unhealthy cells, where they occur, are a
threat to our quality of life because their content has not been correlated
with a language that can repeat success and avoid failure. Annexation has been
unlimited and rarely contributes to the formation of essential open space
arteries. Movement and life support arteries are included to serve the Shelter
Division, but open space pockets have often been an inadequate substitute for the
open space arteries required.
The problem
is compounded because unhealthy cells can be recognized but not diagnosed.
These conditions exist because a method of measurement, evaluation, and
correlation with an adequate, quantitative leadership language has been
missing.
The language
begins with recognition:
(1)
that
there are now two worlds on a single planet,
(2)
that
the Built Domain is composed of Urban and Rural Phyla,
(3)
that
both phyla contain four divisions: Shelter, Movement, Open Space, and Life
Support,
(4)
that
the Shelter Division is served by the movement, open space, and life support
divisions,
(5)
that
the Shelter Division contains seven primary shelter design categories,
(6)
that
design specifications identify the cellular content of each category,
(7)
that
cellular content can be measured and evaluated at existing locations to build a
consistent database of knowledge,
(8)
that
consistent, measurable cell content can lead to the definition of healthy and
unhealthy cells,
(9)
that
master equations can be written to correlate and lead the behavior of cell
content,
(10) that cell aggregations can be planned
and led to improve our physical, social, psychological, environmental, and
economic quality of life, and
(11) that visualization of the problem before us,
and the language needed for discussion, can lead us to the symbiotic quality of
life we must discover.
We have not been given the DNA we need. We must
write it. The language of city design offers the opportunity to begin. My
previous books have addressed this topic with a mathematically driven language
of shelter planning. The final draft of my new book is substantially complete.
It represents a simplified, comprehensive, and improved explanation of the
design specification templates and forecast models that add precision and
credibility to the discussion of shelter capacity for growing populations with
geographic limits that protect their physical, social, psychological,
environmental, and economic quality of life within the umbrella terms health,
safety, and welfare.